Source-of-funds
verification.
A wallet balance is not a provenance record. We reconcile the documentary and on-chain history of crypto wealth so banks, law firms, transaction teams, and clients can make informed risk decisions.
Connect declared wealth
to verifiable activity.
We examine how assets were acquired, moved, held, and converted, and whether the evidence supports the stated explanation. The scope can cover a specific transaction, selected wallets, or a longer period of crypto activity.
Blockchain analytics is one part of the answer. Exchange statements, bank records, contracts, tax material, corporate records, and evidence of wallet control provide the off-chain context needed for a balanced conclusion.
The narrative we test
A broad origin is asserted
Wealth is described as trading profit, early investment, mining, payment, or a gift without records linking the claim to the assets.Only selected evidence appears
Screenshots or current balances are supplied while acquisition records, complete statements, counterparties, or losing activity are absent.The chain of custody breaks
Transfers between services and self-hosted wallets are not reconciled, leaving ownership, value, or third-party exposure unresolved.Urgency replaces explanation
Commercial pressure is used to bypass missing evidence or unresolved risk indicators rather than addressing them proportionately.How we help
Define the question
We agree the assets, period, transaction, risk threshold, and intended use so the review remains targeted and proportionate.
Test records against the chain
We map relevant transactions, assess exposure, verify wallet control where possible, and reconcile documentary evidence with on-chain activity.
Deliver a defensible finding
Our reporting records evidence, methodology, limitations, unresolved issues, and risk-relevant findings for the receiving institution or adviser.
Verify the story behind the assets.
Tell us the transaction, wallets, and decision the verification needs to support.
Scope a verification